Navigating Controversy, Entrepreneurship, and Empowering Fashion’s Future
In a captivating era preceding the cultural battlegrounds, Karlie Kloss, renowned for gracing controversial editorials, transcended norms. From donning geisha attire in Japan to a contentious 2011 editorial showcasing her unhealthily thin physique, she navigated the intricacies of the fashion world. The Victoria’s Secret show saw her as a sultry Indian adorned with a bikini and feathered headdress, and the Marc Jacobs spectacle featured her in a rainbow-hued dreadlock wig. Even amid her marriage to Joshua Kushner, controversies persisted, given his familial ties and substantial wealth.
Post-pandemic, Kloss delved into entrepreneurship, spearheading investors to rescue W Magazine in 2022 and recently acquiring i-D Magazine. Odda Magazine’s David Martin underscores i-D’s significance in fashion history and culture, describing Kloss’s acquisition as intelligent, marking an evolutionary closure of the circle. A woman once featured on i-D covers, now wielding power, breathes life into a magazine deemed essential. As the steward of an independent publication, she emerges as a force reshaping the very fabric of the fashion we comprehend.
Yet, a perplexing shift arises as pro-Palestine narratives vanish from i-D’s realm, prompting speculation about the alignment of the top model, known for liberal views, with the Kushner family’s media ventures. With Observer Media under their influence, suspicions linger that the family trust stealthily orchestrates this acquisition. As the intrigue deepens, Grazia Italy’s esteemed journalist Mabel Casalini steps into the fray.
Addressing the unfolding drama, Mabel Casalini contemplates the broader implications for international press and independent publishing. In this unfolding narrative, she challenges preconceptions, asserting that i-D’s undeniably impactful role in fashion publishing has been intricately linked with Vice Media since its 2012 acquisition.
Emphasizing a nuanced perspective, Casalini posits that the transition to Karlie Kloss is a positive stride, citing the individuality she brings compared to faceless conglomerates or investment funds. Harking back to 2012, when Vice Media’s acquisition marked the end of thirty-two years of independence, she rationalizes, «Being a ‘niche’ magazine then was perceived as a flaw, not an asset. Today, major luxury brands recognize the strategic importance of investing in independent publications catering to a niche audience, rather than adhering to mainstream conventions.» The evolution of i-D thus mirrors the shifting dynamics within the fashion publishing landscape.
In recent days, a Vogue editorial featuring Jeff Bezos and his future wife Lauren Sànchez has ignited scrutiny, perceived by many as a colossal favor—a so-called puff piece. The prevailing sentiment among users echoes a comment beneath Vogue’s Instagram post: «Money can’t buy you class, but it can buy you a Vogue spread.» The editorial, seemingly a tale of opulence lacking relevance or connection to contemporary culture, falls short of inspiring interest.
This spotlight on the privileged lives of the wealthy prompts reflection on the media landscape’s alignment with the rich and powerful. From the legendary Murdoch to the opulent Newhouse dynasty controlling Advance Publications (home to Condé Nast and Vogue), with stakes in Warner Bros. Discovery and Charter Communications, media’s reins often rest in influential hands. Despite vast budgets and expansive global networks, these major publishers struggle to resonate with “real” culture, their commercial interests overshadowing an authentic narrative of the world, and failing to capture readers’ genuine interests before they unfold. In essence, they are becoming increasingly commercialized and detached from the pulse of genuine cultural expression.
In the realm of independent magazines, a distinctive autonomy flourishes, even under the influence of advertisers. Unlike their mainstream counterparts tethered to a mass-pleasing celebrity culture, these independents carve out a cultural niche. They eschew the need for a superficial generalism to prop up sales, embodying a more nuanced and thoughtful approach.
Today, a fresh wave of independent journalists like Bliss Foster, Odunayo Ojo, and the transformative journey of Brenda Weischer from freelance to 032c, has assumed the mantle of fashion criticism, seamlessly navigating the realms of digital and print. Simultaneously, publications such as Odda, L’Etiquette, and Where is the cool? stand tall as fully recognized entities, injecting creativity and vision into the industry through high-profile productions.
At the institutional level, trailblazing brands like Bottega Veneta champion editorial independence, supporting historic publications like Butt Magazine while preserving a rare cultural sensitivity. Mabel Casalini, the founder of Curlycurl and journalist for Grazia Italy, articulates the ethos driving this movement: «Freedom, creativity, an eye that can truly give a personal interpretation of its product is sought after.» This underscores a shift toward valuing editorial independence as a cornerstone of a magazine’s worth.
As Casalini envisions, the future lies in sustainable growth, defying the conventional route of big investment funds. This approach remains tethered to the editorial line, gaining recognition for its consistency and unique perspective. However, amidst this renaissance, a crucial question arises: does independent publishing possess the capacity to not only interpret but also challenge and redefine the narrative within the indie editorial scene?
The allure of independent publishing resonates universally, with multi-brand boutiques evolving into curated sanctuaries that transcend mere clothing and design, embracing specialized magazines. These elevated newsstands cater to a hyper-specific audience, fostering a symbiotic relationship between fashion and print media. Yet, within this flourishing landscape, the imperative emerges for these specialist magazines to cultivate not only curated aesthetics but also a critical dimension, steering clear of narratives excessively enamored with fashion in an age dominated by controlled and “regime” communication.
In this propitious era for magazine development, the absence of untarnished knights becomes apparent. An insightful perspective is offered by an observer who notes, «My impression, without generalizing, is that few independent magazines question the status quo.» This discerning voice highlights a tendency for these publications to navigate the same aesthetic terrain as the mainstream—replete with pasty, faux-spontaneous undertones. A scarcity of well-defined, original identities prevails, with an overabundance of 90s references or editorial structures transforming magazines into eclectic repositories without a distinct viewpoint.
This state of fragmentation mirrors the broader industry’s segmentation into micro-communities, where a dearth of transversal entities capable of engaging with communities beyond the fashion “bubble” is palpable. Contrastingly, luminaries like i-D stand as testament to the potential of transcending this fragmentation. Over the years, i-D has evolved into an alternative representation channel, a laboratory of innovation, and a fertile training ground for a generation of talents now at the pinnacle of the industry. In this dynamic landscape, the challenge remains: Can independent magazines become true pillars of collective imagination, echoing the influential role that i-D has played in fashion’s narrative evolution?
The acquisition of i-D Magazine by Karlie Kloss unfolds with a tapestry of ambiguity. While Kloss emerges as the girlboss rescuing struggling independent publications, the shadows of her nightly dinners with the Kushners loom large. This billionaire family, deeply entrenched in politics, raises questions about the capital’s influence in the recently announced deal. The systematic erasure of pro-Palestine content from Kloss’s magazine and social media resonates loudly. While such practices are not entirely unheard of, the fact that it unfolds within i-D Magazine, a traditionally progressive bastion that launched the careers of industry stalwarts like Edward Enniful and Pat McGrath, renders this acquisition a potential setback.
The pressing question surfaces: To whose advantage does this entire operation lean? Alastair McKimm, the current editor-in-chief, undoubtedly wields influence in preserving the magazine’s editorial integrity under new management. However, lingering suspicions persist, hoping to be disproven, that i-D Magazine might veer towards becoming a mouthpiece for interests distinct from its progressive past. When we refer to interests, we delve beyond the realm of merely crafting a compelling magazine, raising concerns about the potential transformation of i-D into a conduit for motives beyond its historical ethos.
curlycurlworld: Get Twisted with CurlyCurl: The Latest in Curls, Coils, and Confidence! 